Continuation in Light of Fiqh al-Zarf (Jurisprudence of Context)
You have asked for this analysis to be continued specifically through the lens of Fiqh al-Zarf—the jurisprudence of context, circumstance, and temporal/spatial reality. This is a sophisticated and necessary framework. Without it, sacred texts become rigid artifacts, and with it, they become living guidance.
The comparison between Sawdah (RA) and the modernist Muslim woman cannot be resolved by simply citing texts. It must be resolved by understanding why Sawdah acted as she did in her zarf (context) and why the modernist woman acts as she does in hers—and whether the two contexts are actually analogous.
1. What Is Fiqh al-Zarf?
Fiqh al-Zarf is not a separate madhhab. It is a methodological lens within Usul al-Fiqh that acknowledges:
“The ruling changes with the change of time, place, custom, and circumstance.”
— A maxim derived from the practice of the Sahaba and codified by later jurists.
This does not mean Allah’s law changes. It means the application of the law is contextual. The prohibition of khamr is eternal, but whether a specific substance is khamr depends on its intoxicating property, not its name. Similarly, the obligation of hijab is eternal, but what constitutes hijab in 7th-century Arabia differs from what constitutes hijab in 21st-century London—not in essence, but in expression.
Thus:
- Sawdah’s zarf was 7th-century Medina.
- The modernist woman’s zarf is the 21st-century globalized world.
- To judge both by the same literal action is un-Islamic. To judge both by the same principle is Islamic.
2. Sawdah’s Zarf: The Early Ummah in Formation
Sawdah (RA) lived in a context where:
| Element | Reality |
|---|---|
| Revelation | The Qur’an was still being revealed until shortly before her husband’s death. The ayah of hijab (33:53) and tabarruj (33:33) were fresh, recent, and being implemented with extreme caution. |
| The Prophet (PBUH) | He was alive during most of her marriage. His presence meant divine guidance was accessible. After his death, the Sahaba were hyper-vigilant about preserving the Sunna. |
| Umar’s Intervention | Umar (RA) was not being cruel. He was implementing the spirit of hijab in a society where the Prophet’s wives were ummahat al-mu’mineen—mothers of the believers, yet also public figures whose conduct set precedent. |
| Sawdah’s Age & Stature | She was an older woman, large in build, easily recognizable. Her going out at night drew attention. She did not want to be the cause of fitna or a bad precedent. |
| The Home | The home was the center of ilm. The Prophet’s wives did not need to go out for education, employment, or social life. The Ummah came to them. |
Sawdah’s choice was rational, pious, and context-appropriate.
She did not abandon Hajj because she hated Hajj. She abandoned it because in her context, her presence outside could:
- Draw attention to the Prophet’s household.
- Encourage others to be lax in hijab.
- Cause her personal discomfort (being recognized and addressed by men).
Her zarf made her act a fadilah. In her time, going out less was a sign of iman.
3. The Modernist Woman’s Zarf: The Ummah in Dispersion
The modernist Muslim woman today lives in a radically different zarf:
| Element | Reality |
|---|---|
| Revelation | Closed. No new revelation. No living Prophet. No Sahaba enforcing hijab with moral authority. |
| Community | Muslims are minorities in many lands, or majorities with weak Islamic governance. The home is no longer the sole center of Islamic learning. |
| Economic Reality | In many contexts, one income is insufficient. Women must work to survive, or to support aging parents, or to educate children. |
| Social Reality | Isolation is not piety; it is dysfunction. A woman who never leaves home in the West may have no access to female company, Islamic knowledge, or even halal food. |
| The Husband | He is not the Prophet (PBUH). He is not even necessarily a righteous man. He may be abusive, negligent, or culturally controlling rather than Islamically authoritative. |
| The Car | The car is not a camel. In many cities, there is no public transport. Not driving means paralysis. Not driving means dependence on strangers (Uber/taxi drivers who are non-mahram). Not driving may mean inability to take children to school or attend the masjid. |
Thus, for a modernist woman to insist on driving or working is not necessarily tabarruj or disobedience. It may be darurah (necessity) or hajah (genuine need).
4. The Error of Direct Analogy (Tashbih bi la Tafriq)
The error in the traditionalist critique is lifting Sawdah’s action from her zarf and dropping it into a different zarf without adjustment.
This is like saying:
- “The Ansar gave their best dates in charity. Therefore, you must give your best dates in charity.”
- But what if you live in a non-date-producing country? What if you are allergic to dates? What if dates are luxury goods and bread is the staple?
The act is not the principle.
The principle from Sawdah (RA):
- “A pious woman minimizes unnecessary exposure to non-mahram men out of modesty and obedience to Allah.”
The application in 7th-century Medina:
- “She stays home entirely, avoids Hajj, and does not go out at night.”
The application in 21st-century London/New York/Lahore:
- “She goes out for necessity, dresses modestly, drives herself to avoid mixing with strange men in taxis, and returns home promptly.”
Same principle. Different application. Both correct in their zarf.
5. The Husband’s Zarf: Authority vs. Control
Fiqh al-zarf also applies to the husband.
In Sawdah’s case, her husband was the Prophet (PBUH)—the most merciful, just, and deserving of obedience. His commands were always ma’ruf. His authority was absolute, but his use of it was gentle.
In the modernist case, the husband may be:
| Type of Husband | His Command | Wife’s Obligation |
|---|---|---|
| Righteous, fair, providing | “Please don’t work unless necessary; I fear for your modesty.” | She should obey if possible. |
| Abusive, neglectful, or culturally oppressive | “You are forbidden from driving even to your mother’s funeral.” | He is sinning. She may disobey. |
| Financially incapable | “Don’t work.” | He cannot enforce this if the family needs her income. |
| Paranoid/irrational | “Your driving is unsafe” (when it is safe). | She should reassure, but not be imprisoned by his unfounded fears. |
Fiqh al-zarf tells us:
- The husband’s authority is fixed.
- The scope of his authority is contextual.
- The wife’s obedience is conditional upon his command being ma’ruf and not harmful.
Thus, a woman disobeying an unjust husband is not the same as a woman disobeying the Prophet (PBUH). The zarf of the husband changes the ruling.
6. The Tragedy: Modernist Excess vs. Traditionalist Rigidity
When we apply Fiqh al-Zarf honestly, we see two extremes that are both wrong:
| Extreme | Error | Consequence |
|---|---|---|
| Modernist Excess | Abandons the principle entirely. Sees Sawdah as “backward” and her modesty as “oppression.” Rejects husband’s authority even when valid. | Loss of haya, loss of barakah in marriage, imitation of secular feminism. |
| Traditionalist Rigidity | Lifts Sawdah’s action and imposes it literally on all women in all times. Denies the wife’s rights, ignores economic realities, equates her necessity with disobedience. | Pushes women away from Islam, causes marital oppression, confuses culture with religion. |
The middle path (wasatiyyah):
- Honor Sawdah’s spirit: modesty, obedience to Allah, deference to valid authority, caution against fitna.
- Honor the modern woman’s reality: necessity, education, mobility, agency.
- Judge each case by its zarf, not by a frozen snapshot of 7th-century Medina.
7. A New Framework: The Pyramid of Contextual Rulings
Using Fiqh al-Zarf, we can construct a graduated ruling for women’s mobility:
| Level | Context | Ruling |
|---|---|---|
| 1. Darurah (Necessity) | No food, no medicine, no transport except driving. | Obligatory to go out/drive. Sawdah would approve. |
| 2. Hajah (Need) | Work required for basic comfort; no access to Islamic education at home. | Permissible and recommended to seek halak. |
| 3. Tahsin (Improvement) | Work for career growth; driving for convenience. | Permissible with husband’s consent, modesty maintained. |
| 4. Fadilah (Virtue) | Staying home when not needed, avoiding unnecessary outings. | Praiseworthy, but not obligatory. Sawdah’s level. |
| 5. Israf (Excess) | Going out for vanity, disobedience, tabarruj, or to harm husband. | Haram. This is the opposite of Sawdah. |
8. Conclusion: Sawdah Is Not a Chain, She Is a Light
Sawdah bint Zamah (RA) is not meant to be a chain binding women to the floor of their homes in all times and places.
She is meant to be a light showing the direction of piety: toward Allah, away from vanity, and toward modesty.
- In her zarf, that light led her inside.
- In another zarf, that same light may lead a woman outside—to work, to drive, to seek knowledge, to defend her rights, to feed her children.
The sin is not in the going out. The sin is in the tabarruj, the disobedience to Allah, and the injustice to the husband.
The virtue is not in the staying in. The virtue is in the niyyah, the modesty, and the obedience to Allah.
Sawdah avoided Hajj because she feared being seen.
The modernist woman drives because she fears her children starving, her mind stagnating, or her soul suffocating.
Both are responding to their zarf. Both will be judged by their intentions.
And Allah knows best.
A spiritual Ishmaelite 
Leave a comment