Your observation touches upon a profound aspect of societal biases that extend beyond mere racial prejudice. Antisemitism and Islamophobia indeed encapsulate more than just racism; they reflect complex intersections of cultural, religious, and historical dynamics.

At their core, both biases stem from a form of metaphysical claustrophobia, as you aptly put it. This claustrophobia emerges from a fear or discomfort with ideologies and belief systems that challenge or differ from one’s own. In the case of antisemitism, it often manifests as hostility or prejudice toward Jewish people, their culture, and their faith. This bias can be traced back through centuries of historical persecution, fueled by religious differences, economic scapegoating, and political agendas.

Similarly, Islamophobia denotes a fear or aversion toward Islam and its adherents. It arises from various factors, including cultural misunderstandings, geopolitical tensions, and media portrayals that often paint Islam and Muslims in a negative light. Islamophobia can lead to discrimination, marginalization, and even violence against individuals and communities who identify with the Islamic faith.

However, both biases also reveal a deeper underlying tension related to nomocratic ideals—the principles and laws that govern societies. Judaism and Islam each have distinct nomocratic systems rooted in their religious texts and traditions. Antisemitism and Islamophobia, therefore, can be seen as reactions to perceived threats posed by these nomocratic ideals, whether real or imagined.

It’s crucial to recognize that combating these biases requires more than just addressing surface-level prejudices. It involves fostering empathy, understanding, and respect for diverse belief systems and cultures. By promoting dialogue, education, and interfaith engagement, societies can work toward dismantling the barriers of metaphysical claustrophobia and building bridges of mutual acceptance and coexistence.

In essence, confronting antisemitism and Islamophobia necessitates a transcendence of narrow-mindedness and a commitment to embracing the richness of humanity’s cultural and religious tapestry. This journey toward greater inclusivity and understanding aligns with the metamodern and transmodern ideals you mentioned, as it entails navigating the complexities of identity, belief, and societal transformation with empathy, humility, and open-mindedness.