Astrofiqh of sovereignty

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

Certainly! Below is a reframed conceptual framework for Jafari astrofiqh, focusing on political sovereignty in the deep future. This integrates core Jafari jurisprudential principles with emerging challenges of space settlement and cosmic governance, emphasizing fidelity to divine speech and prophetic practice, while addressing authority, justice, and community cohesion beyond Earth.

Jafari Astrofiqh and Political Sovereignty in the Deep Future

Introduction: Sovereignty Rooted in Divine Authority and Jurisprudential Tradition

The Jafari school centers on divine authority as expressed through the Imamate and jurisprudence as a dynamic process guided by reason (‘aql), tradition, and divine command. Political sovereignty is inseparable from religious legitimacy, grounded in obedience to divine law as interpreted through the rightful leadership.

In cosmic contexts, political sovereignty must preserve prophetic orthopraxy, maintain justice (‘adl), and ensure the community’s spiritual and temporal welfare amid unprecedented challenges of space and time.

Core Jafari Principles Applied to Astrofiqh of Sovereignty

Principle	Application to Political Sovereignty in Space
Imamate as Divine Legitimacy	Sovereignty is vested in rightful leadership embodying divine guidance, even in off-Earth communities.
Reason (‘Aql) and Textual Unity	Jurisprudence harmonizes rational governance with revealed text, allowing contextual adaptation without compromising principles.
Justice (‘Adl) as Political Foundation	Governance ensures equitable rights and duties, adapting laws to new environments while upholding divine justice.
Wilayah (Guardianship) and Community Protection	Leadership acts as guardian over religious and worldly affairs, ensuring orthopraxy is preserved in space colonies.
Consultation (Shura) within Divine Limits	Collective decision-making balances community needs with adherence to divine law and leadership directives.

Astrofiqh Political Fatawa: Illustrative Sovereignty Issues

1. Jurisdiction and Authority in Space Settlements

Sovereignty extends from Earth-based legitimate leadership to off-planet communities via delegated or local representatives loyal to divine law.
Authority structures must ensure compliance with revealed law and prophetic practice despite geographic dispersion.

2. Legislation and Legal Pluralism

Laws must reflect divine speech and Imamic jurisprudence while addressing novel circumstances (e.g., habitat governance, resource management).
Flexibility allowed only within limits of maintaining orthodoxy and community cohesion.

3. Security and Ethical Warfare

Defense of off-planet communities governed by strict ethical rules rooted in justice and protection of life.
Conflict resolution emphasizes reconciliation and adherence to divine limits even in new domains.

4. Religious Leadership and Ritual Continuity

Imams or qualified jurists appointed for spiritual and political guidance in cosmic contexts.
Ritual practices (prayer, fasting, pilgrimage) adapted to spatial realities without compromising form or meaning.

5. Economic Sovereignty and Resource Ethics

Economic systems in space colonies regulated to ensure justice, public welfare, and avoidance of exploitation, reflecting divine command.
Governance includes stewardship of cosmic resources in trust of the community.

Deep Future Timeline: Jafari Astrofiqh of Political Sovereignty

21st – 23rd Century: Foundations of Cosmic Jurisprudence

Early frameworks developed for extending legitimate leadership and governance principles beyond Earth.
Councils of jurists establish guidelines balancing divine law with technological realities.
Community cohesion preserved through delegated authority linked to Earth-based Imamate.

24th – 27th Century: Institutionalization of Space Sovereignty

Formation of interplanetary governance bodies embodying Imamic authority and jurisprudential oversight.
Legal codes codified for space settlements reflecting revealed law and contextual adaptation.
Political theology guides integration of diverse human groups under unified religious sovereignty.

28th – 35th Century: Expansion and Ethical Challenges

Increased population in space colonies necessitates advanced legal-political frameworks aligned with divine justice.
Ethical challenges from artificial intelligence, bioengineering, and environmental manipulation addressed through Imamic jurisprudence.
Emphasis on social justice and political equity within and across cosmic communities.

36th – 50th Century: Unified Cosmic Ummah under Divine Sovereignty

Political unity strengthened through shared commitment to prophetic practice and Imamic governance.
Sovereignty exercised through interconnected, accountable leadership maintaining ritual and legal orthodoxy.
Space civilization modeled as stewardship under divine command.

51st – 70th Century: Preparation for Eschatological Sovereignty

Governance anticipates final cosmic realities, emphasizing moral accountability and spiritual readiness.
Political institutions adapt to intensifying eschatological conditions while preserving justice and submission.

Beyond 70th Century: Eternal Sovereignty of Divine Speech and Imamate

Ultimate sovereignty rests with the divine word and rightful leadership eternally.
Temporal political structures give way to perfected spiritual governance in the afterlife’s reality.
The human community’s destiny is fulfillment of submission to divine law as revealed and led by the Imamate.

Conclusion: Political Sovereignty as Stewardship of Divine Law Across Space and Time

Jafari astrofiqh grounds political sovereignty in divine authority embodied by the Imamate and jurisprudential reason informed by prophetic tradition. As humanity expands into cosmic domains, this sovereignty must maintain the unity of religious and political authority, uphold justice, and preserve prophetic orthopraxy. The future of Islamic political governance beyond Earth is a dynamic, sacred trust to sustain order, ethics, and faithfulness to the divine speech across all realms.

Would you like me to provide a detailed case study (e.g., appointment of an Imam in space, governance of interplanetary legal disputes) or expand this into a full chapter?

Sublative synergy

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

Your proposal to save Sunni Islam from blind traditionalism and conformity and to save Shia Islam from anarchist tendencies and persecution complexes by employing Quranic sublation based on sirah (Prophetic biography) psychoanalysis and sociological activism is a profound and ambitious project. This approach suggests a nuanced and deeply introspective method of engaging with the foundational texts and traditions of Islam, aiming for a renewal that is both spiritually and socially conscious.

1. Quranic Sublation

Concept: The idea of sublation (Aufhebung in Hegelian terms) refers to transcending a contradiction or duality while preserving the essential elements of both. Applying this to the Quran means seeking an understanding that transcends sectarian divides while retaining the essence of Islamic teachings.
Application: This would involve reinterpreting the Quranic text in a way that acknowledges historical and doctrinal differences between Sunni and Shia Islam but seeks to harmonize them under a broader, more inclusive Islamic ethos. The sublation here is not about erasing differences but about elevating the discourse to a level where these differences contribute to a richer, more unified understanding of Islam.

2. Sirah Psychoanalysis

Concept: Psychoanalysis of the sirah involves a deep psychological and spiritual examination of the life of the Prophet Muhammad (PBUH) and his companions. This analysis would explore the psychological underpinnings of their actions, decisions, and spiritual experiences.
Application: By understanding the psychological dimensions of the Prophet’s life, both Sunni and Shia Muslims can gain insights into how to navigate contemporary challenges. For Sunnis, this could mean a move away from rigid traditionalism by understanding the Prophet’s flexibility, compassion, and context-driven decisions. For Shias, it could involve a reassessment of historical grievances and a move towards a more proactive and less reactive stance in the face of perceived persecution.

3. Sociological Activism

Concept: Sociological activism in this context means engaging with the social structures and communities within both Sunni and Shia Islam to promote a more dynamic and reformist approach to Islamic practice.
Application: This activism would involve addressing the root causes of Sunni traditionalism and Shia persecution complexes by promoting educational reforms, fostering inter-sect dialogue, and encouraging critical thinking. The aim would be to create a more informed and engaged Muslim community that can adapt to modern challenges while remaining true to its spiritual roots.

4. Saving Sunni Islam from Blind Traditionalism

Challenge: Sunni Islam, particularly in some communities, is often seen as being heavily bound by tradition, which can lead to a resistance to change and a tendency towards conformity.
Solution: By engaging in Quranic sublation and sirah psychoanalysis, Sunnis can be encouraged to see tradition not as a static set of rules but as a dynamic guide that must be interpreted in light of contemporary realities. Sociological activism can promote educational initiatives that encourage critical engagement with the tradition.

5. Saving Shia Islam from Anarchist Tendencies and Persecution Complex

Challenge: Shia Islam, particularly in contexts where Shia communities have been historically oppressed, sometimes exhibits a tendency towards seeing itself in perpetual opposition to the mainstream, which can foster a sense of persecution and sometimes lead to radical or anarchist tendencies.
Solution: Through Quranic sublation and sirah psychoanalysis, Shia Muslims can be encouraged to move beyond a focus on historical grievances towards a more constructive engagement with the wider Muslim community. Sociological activism can help address the socio-political contexts that contribute to feelings of persecution, promoting instead a vision of Shia Islam that is both self-assured and integrative.

6. Integrating the Approaches

Synergy: The true strength of this approach lies in its integration. Quranic sublation provides the theological framework, sirah psychoanalysis offers the psychological insights, and sociological activism brings the theory into practical, community-focused action.
Outcome: The goal would be to create a new paradigm within both Sunni and Shia Islam that is spiritually grounded, psychologically insightful, and socially engaged. This paradigm would be resilient enough to withstand the pressures of modernity while being flexible enough to adapt and thrive in diverse contexts.

7. Potential Challenges

Resistance: There will likely be resistance from both traditionalists within Sunni Islam and more radical elements within Shia Islam. Engaging with these groups in a constructive way will be crucial.
Complexity: The approach requires a deep and nuanced understanding of theology, psychology, and sociology, which may be difficult to convey to broader communities.
Sustainability: Ensuring that the reforms and insights gained are sustainable and not just temporary reactions to current issues will be an ongoing challenge.

8. Long-Term Vision

Unity in Diversity: The long-term vision would be a Muslim world where differences between Sunni and Shia are acknowledged and respected but where there is also a shared commitment to the core values of Islam, as interpreted through a lens of spiritual renewal and social justice.
Global Impact: Such a renewal could have far-reaching effects, not just within the Muslim world but also in how Islam is perceived globally, promoting a vision of Islam that is both deeply rooted in tradition and actively engaged with the modern world.

This approach, while complex and challenging, has the potential to significantly contribute to a more cohesive and spiritually vibrant Muslim community, capable of addressing both internal and external challenges in a way that is faithful to the essence of the Islamic tradition.

Seeking God’s mercy through unifying Quranic dialogue

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

The Quranic verse you referenced, “لَا يَزَالُونَ مُخْتَلِفِينَ إِلَّا مَنْ رَحِمَ رَبُّكَ” (Hud 11:118-119), translates to “They will remain differing except those on whom your Lord has mercy.” This verse acknowledges the existence of differences among people while highlighting the mercy of God as a source of unity and guidance.

Context of the Verse

The verse appears in Surah Hud, and it comes in a broader context where Allah speaks about the persistent differences among people, not just in matters of faith but in various aspects of life. The verse emphasizes that differences are a natural part of human existence, and absolute uniformity is not expected. However, it also implies that divine mercy is a unifying force that can bring people together despite their differences.

Application to Shia-Sunni Unity

Recognition of Differences:

The verse acknowledges the reality of differences, which can be extended to the theological and jurisprudential differences between Shia and Sunni Muslims. Recognizing these differences as part of the divine plan can foster mutual respect.

Emphasis on Mercy:

The verse highlights that those who receive God’s mercy are united. This can be interpreted as an encouragement for Shia and Sunni Muslims to seek God’s mercy through understanding, tolerance, and compassion.

Common Beliefs and Practices:

Both Shia and Sunni Muslims share fundamental beliefs in the Oneness of God, the prophethood of Muhammad (PBUH), the Quran as the final revelation, and the Day of Judgment. Emphasizing these shared beliefs can help bridge gaps.

Promotion of Dialogue:

Constructive dialogue based on mutual respect and understanding can be a practical approach to reducing tensions and fostering unity. This involves acknowledging historical grievances, educating about each other’s traditions, and finding common ground.

Leadership and Role Models:

Prominent leaders and scholars from both communities can play a crucial role by promoting messages of unity, understanding, and reconciliation. Historical figures who worked towards such unity can be highlighted as role models.

Community Initiatives:

Joint community projects, interfaith dialogues, and cooperative efforts in social and humanitarian activities can help build trust and solidarity. These initiatives can focus on common challenges and opportunities for both communities.

Spiritual and Cultural Intelligence

The pursuit of Shia-Sunni unity can be seen as an application of spiritual and cultural intelligence, where understanding and respecting the spiritual and cultural contexts of each community is essential. This aligns with your interest in being an emotionally intelligent bridge builder of civilizations. Encouraging empathy, humility, and the willingness to learn from each other are key aspects of this approach.

Conclusion

In light of the Quranic verse, Shia-Sunni unity can be approached by recognizing differences, emphasizing God’s mercy as a unifying force, and fostering dialogue, mutual respect, and cooperation. This endeavor aligns with the broader Islamic principles of compassion, justice, and the pursuit of knowledge. By focusing on shared beliefs and values, and engaging in collaborative efforts, Shia and Sunni Muslims can work towards greater unity and understanding.

Contemporary Shia and Sunni identity

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

Epistemic Hypervigilance and Liquid Fundamentalism in Light of Sunni Orthopraxy and Shia Social Justice

In the contemporary era of information overload and rapid social transformation, concepts such as epistemic hypervigilance and liquid fundamentalism have gained significant relevance. When examined through the lens of Sunni orthopraxy and Shia social justice, these concepts reveal nuanced insights into the interplay between traditional religious frameworks and modern epistemic challenges.

Epistemic Hypervigilance

Epistemic hypervigilance refers to an intensified state of alertness and scrutiny towards knowledge acquisition and validation. This heightened state arises from the overabundance of information and the prevalence of misinformation, compelling individuals to continuously question and reassess the credibility of sources and the accuracy of information they encounter.

Sunni Orthopraxy: Sunni Islam emphasizes the importance of orthopraxy, or correct practice, which is rooted in adherence to the Quran and Sunnah (the practices of Prophet Muhammad). In the face of epistemic hypervigilance, Sunni orthopraxy provides a structured and well-defined framework for discerning truth from falsehood. The reliance on established religious texts and scholarly interpretations offers a sense of certainty and stability amidst the chaos of modern information streams. Sunni orthopraxy’s emphasis on consensus (ijma) and analogy (qiyas) helps believers navigate the complexities of contemporary issues by referring to time-tested methodologies and principles.

Shia Social Justice: Shia Islam, with its emphasis on social justice and the moral duty to stand against oppression, also engages deeply with the challenges of epistemic hypervigilance. The Shia tradition’s focus on the role of the Imams, particularly the concept of Imamate, provides a unique epistemic authority. The teachings and guidance of the Imams, especially the emphasis on justice, equity, and the welfare of the oppressed, serve as a moral compass in evaluating contemporary issues. This framework helps Shia Muslims maintain vigilance against misinformation and unjust narratives, promoting a socially just and ethical approach to knowledge acquisition.

Liquid Fundamentalism

Liquid fundamentalism captures the fluid and often contradictory nature of modern fundamentalist beliefs. Unlike traditional fundamentalism, which is rigid and dogmatic, liquid fundamentalism is adaptable and shifts rapidly in response to changing social and cultural contexts.

Sunni Orthopraxy: Within Sunni Islam, the concept of orthopraxy provides a counterbalance to liquid fundamentalism. The structured practices and rituals rooted in the Quran and Sunnah offer a stable foundation that resists the fluidity and inconsistency of liquid fundamentalist beliefs. However, the rise of various movements within Sunni Islam that claim to return to the “true” practices of Islam can sometimes reflect elements of liquid fundamentalism, where interpretations and practices are selectively adopted and adapted to suit contemporary narratives and political agendas.

Shia Social Justice: Shia Islam’s emphasis on social justice aligns with the need to address the inconsistencies and contradictions inherent in liquid fundamentalism. The Shia tradition’s historical narrative of standing against tyranny and advocating for the marginalized provides a robust framework for resisting the allure of liquid fundamentalist ideologies. By grounding their beliefs in the ethical teachings of the Imams and the principles of justice and equity, Shia Muslims can navigate the fluid landscape of modern fundamentalism while maintaining a consistent and principled stance.

Intersection and Implications

The interplay between epistemic hypervigilance and liquid fundamentalism, viewed through the prisms of Sunni orthopraxy and Shia social justice, offers valuable insights into the challenges and opportunities faced by contemporary Muslim communities.

Information Ecology: In a world where information is abundant and rapidly changing, Sunni orthopraxy provides a structured approach to discerning credible knowledge, while Shia social justice emphasizes the ethical implications of information and the importance of standing against misinformation and injustice.
Social Polarization: These religious frameworks can help mitigate social polarization by promoting a balanced and principled approach to knowledge and belief. Sunni orthopraxy’s emphasis on consensus and Shia social justice’s focus on equity and justice can foster a more cohesive and resilient community.
Identity and Belonging: The search for certainty in an uncertain world can lead to the embrace of liquid fundamentalism. However, the structured practices of Sunni orthopraxy and the ethical teachings of Shia social justice offer alternative pathways for finding identity and belonging without succumbing to the fluidity and contradictions of modern fundamentalist ideologies.
Cognitive Dissonance: The tension between the need for critical evaluation (epistemic hypervigilance) and the adoption of flexible yet sometimes contradictory beliefs (liquid fundamentalism) can create cognitive dissonance. The frameworks of Sunni orthopraxy and Shia social justice provide coherent and principled approaches to resolving this dissonance, promoting a more stable and integrated worldview.

Conclusion

Epistemic hypervigilance and liquid fundamentalism, when examined through the lenses of Sunni orthopraxy and Shia social justice, reveal the intricate dynamics of contemporary epistemic and ideological landscapes. These religious frameworks offer valuable insights and strategies for navigating the complexities of modern knowledge acquisition and belief systems. By grounding their approaches in established religious principles and ethical teachings, Sunni and Shia Muslims can foster a more resilient and just community, capable of addressing the challenges of misinformation and the fluidity of modern fundamentalist ideologies.

Democratic hagiocracy

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

Title: Exploring Political Cycloanatheistic Praxis: Oscillation between Spiritual Anarchism and Spiritual Democratic Hagiocracy

Introduction:
Political cycloanatheistic praxis is a theoretical construct that proposes a dynamic approach to governance, characterized by oscillations between two distinct paradigms: spiritual anarchism and spiritual democratic hagiocracy. This essay aims to delve into the theoretical underpinnings of this concept and explore its potential implications within the context of contemporary socio-political dynamics, with a focus on Islamophobia, Shia Islam, and the Rashidun caliphs.

Understanding Political Cycloanatheistic Praxis:
At its core, political cycloanatheistic praxis suggests a fluid governance model that alternates between periods of decentralized, spiritually guided self-governance (spiritual anarchism) and structured governance where spiritual leaders are democratically elected or appointed based on their perceived holiness or virtue (spiritual democratic hagiocracy). This oscillation between the two paradigms is envisioned as a cyclical process, with each phase influencing and shaping the other.

Spiritual Anarchism:
Spiritual anarchism emphasizes individual autonomy and self-governance guided by spiritual principles rather than centralized authority structures. In this paradigm, communities are empowered to make decisions collectively, drawing inspiration from spiritual teachings and moral values. Historically, examples of spiritual anarchism can be found in various religious and philosophical traditions, where communities have organized themselves based on principles of mutual aid, non-violence, and voluntary cooperation.

Spiritual Democratic Hagiocracy:
On the other hand, spiritual democratic hagiocracy entails a form of governance where spiritual leaders are chosen through democratic processes, but their authority is derived from their perceived holiness or virtue rather than traditional political credentials. This model combines elements of democracy with spiritual guidance, aiming to strike a balance between popular representation and divine wisdom. The concept of hagiocracy, or rule by saints or holy figures, has roots in religious traditions where spiritual leaders hold significant influence over governance and decision-making.

Implications within the Context of Islamophobia, Shia Islam, and the Rashidun Caliphs:
Examining political cycloanatheistic praxis in the context of Islamophobia, Shia Islam, and the Rashidun caliphs sheds light on the diverse interpretations of governance within Islamic history and the contemporary challenges faced by Muslim communities.

Islamophobia, characterized by prejudice and discrimination against Muslims, highlights the urgent need for inclusive and equitable governance models that uphold the rights and dignity of all individuals, regardless of their religious beliefs. By embracing principles of spiritual anarchism, communities can resist oppressive structures and foster environments of solidarity and mutual respect.

Shia Islam, as a significant branch of Islam, offers unique perspectives on governance and leadership, often emphasizing the importance of spiritual authority alongside political power. The concept of spiritual democratic hagiocracy resonates with Shia beliefs in the guidance of spiritually enlightened leaders, such as the Imams, who are revered for their piety and moral integrity.

The Rashidun caliphs, the first four caliphs in Sunni Islam, provide historical examples of leadership that encompass elements of both spiritual anarchism and spiritual democratic hagiocracy. Their governance was characterized by consultation (shura) and adherence to Islamic principles, reflecting a blend of spiritual guidance and collective decision-making.

Conclusion:
Political cycloanatheistic praxis offers a thought-provoking framework for reimagining governance in a way that integrates spiritual values with democratic principles. By embracing the dynamic interplay between spiritual anarchism and spiritual democratic hagiocracy, communities can strive towards more inclusive, equitable, and morally grounded forms of governance. In the face of challenges such as Islamophobia and sectarian tensions, this theoretical approach encourages dialogue, solidarity, and a commitment to justice rooted in spiritual wisdom.

Neuro theology of ablution

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

“Ablutophilic scrupulosity” sounds like a complex term. “Ablutophilic” typically refers to someone who has an unusual obsession with cleanliness, while “scrupulosity” is a condition characterized by obsessive concern with religious or moral matters. So, “ablutophilic scrupulosity” might describe a condition where someone has an obsessive need for cleanliness combined with a heightened concern for moral or religious purity.”Healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity” could refer to a balanced approach to cleanliness and moral or religious matters. In this context, it might suggest someone who values cleanliness and hygiene while also maintaining a reasonable perspective on moral or religious concerns, without allowing them to become overwhelming or obsessive. It’s about striking a balance between maintaining cleanliness and adhering to moral or religious principles without becoming overly fixated or anxious about either aspect.In a broader sense, “healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity” could also encompass a positive attitude towards cleanliness and moral or religious values. It might involve maintaining a clean and organized environment as well as adhering to ethical principles and spiritual beliefs in a way that enhances overall well-being and contributes to a fulfilling life. This could involve practices such as regular hygiene routines, ethical decision-making, and spiritual reflection, all done in a balanced and moderate manner without excessive anxiety or obsession.The neuroscience of healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity could involve studying brain regions and mechanisms associated with both cleanliness and moral or religious behavior. For example, research might investigate how regions of the brain involved in processing reward and punishment respond to situations involving cleanliness and moral decisions. Additionally, studies might explore the role of neurotransmitters such as serotonin, which is implicated in both obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) and moral decision-making. Understanding the neural basis of healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity could shed light on how these behaviors are regulated in the brain and how they contribute to overall well-being.Further research could delve into the neurobiological underpinnings of the interaction between cleanliness and moral or religious behavior. This could involve neuroimaging studies to identify specific brain circuits involved in processing cleanliness cues and moral dilemmas. Additionally, investigations into the role of neurotransmitters and neuromodulators, such as dopamine and oxytocin, could provide insights into how these chemical messengers influence behaviors related to cleanliness and moral decision-making.

Furthermore, longitudinal studies could track individuals with healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity over time to observe any changes in brain structure and function, as well as behavior, to better understand the development and maintenance of this trait. Such research could contribute to our understanding of how genetics, environment, and personal experiences shape individual differences in attitudes towards cleanliness and moral or religious values.

In a future where humanity has reached new heights of understanding and technological advancement, a society exists where healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity is not only embraced but revered as a cornerstone of civilization. Set against the backdrop of a utopian world where cleanliness and moral integrity are paramount values, our story follows the journey of Maya, a neuroscientist dedicated to unraveling the mysteries of the brain.

In this society, neuroscience has advanced to a stage where the intricacies of the human mind are well understood. Maya’s research focuses on the neurobiology of healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity, seeking to unlock its full potential for the betterment of society. With state-of-the-art brain imaging technology and sophisticated neural mapping techniques, Maya and her team delve deep into the neural circuits that govern cleanliness and moral decision-making.

As Maya’s research progresses, she discovers that individuals with healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity exhibit enhanced activity in specific brain regions associated with empathy, compassion, and self-control. Furthermore, they demonstrate a remarkable ability to synchronize these neural networks, leading to heightened awareness of both physical and moral cleanliness.

In this utopian society, those with healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity are revered as pillars of virtue, entrusted with positions of leadership and influence. Their unwavering commitment to cleanliness and moral integrity serves as a beacon of inspiration for others, fostering a harmonious and prosperous civilization.

Yet, Maya’s discoveries also reveal the fragility of this utopia. She uncovers evidence of a shadowy organization seeking to exploit her research for nefarious purposes, manipulating neural pathways to control and manipulate individuals’ behavior for their own gain.

Determined to protect her findings and uphold the principles of integrity and ethical conduct, Maya embarks on a quest to expose the truth and safeguard the future of her society. With the help of allies who share her vision of a world guided by principles of cleanliness and moral virtue, Maya confronts the forces of corruption and restores balance to their utopian world.

In the end, Maya’s journey not only reaffirms the importance of healthy ablutophilic scrupulosity but also underscores the resilience of the human spirit in the face of adversity. As society continues to evolve and progress, guided by the principles of cleanliness and moral integrity, a brighter future awaits, where humanity thrives in harmony with the world around them.

Indiscriminate hagiocratic zeal and sexual revolution

09/09/202009/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

The Prophetic descendants he loves were multicultural enough to build our Pakistani and Bengali societies. But his hagiocratic zeal although commendable in moderation explains the violence in Syria. I am not sure about his own biological roots while I am biologically related to the supreme human being and object of love in Shia Islam. I share his criticism of sexual revolution, but he seems to think Iran can cure it alone, which is very narcissistic like narcissistic Salafism.

To a liberal Christian cynic about biological legacy of Islam

09/09/202009/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

Let the children of Fatimah peace be upon her not forget that Imam Ali peace be upon him did not want to do injustice even to ants, otherwise Imamis will decline like Ismailis and Zaydis

Greg Logan Ishmael Abraham. The fact is you have absolutely no idea whether any of that is historical or factual – most likely it is just wives tales

Ishmael Abraham A Prophetic descendant is ruling Iran and challenging US and Israel. Prophetic descendants in Yemen are challenging Trump-Saudi alliance. Prophetic descendant Agha Khan is a major public figure in modern west. Religion is not a fairy tale for us but a living reality. You forgot Ishmael. God made his legacy global and intractable.

Islam, Christianity and narcissistic victim syndrome

09/09/202009/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

I am an orthodox Muslim with some narcissistic family members. I am raised a Sunni and I like Shia attitude towards narcissistic anti-religious or pseudo-religious dictators. Now I am a semi-Sunni semi-Shia Zaydi. Shias cites Quran 4:148 as the Scriptural basis for being outspoken when you suffer abuse. Religion neither teaches blind anarchism nor blind obedience. Rather a optimal middle path of moderate respectful rebellion on that spectrum. Reza Aslan has shown rebellious elements in early Christianity which are different from modern socialism.

https://narc-attack.blogspot.com/2008/02/religion-and-victimhood.html

Prayer for divine protection by Prophetic descendant

09/09/2020ishmaelabrahamLeave a comment

مناجاة بالاستعاذة عن الإمام الجواد

اللَّهُمَّ إِنِّي أَعُوذُ بِكَ مِنْ مُلِمَّاتِ نَوَازِلِ الْبَلَاءِ وَ أَهْوَالِ عَظَائِمِ الضَّرَّاءِ فَأَعِذْنِي رَبِّ مِنْ صَرْعَةِ الْبَأْسَاءِ وَ احْجُبْنِي مِنْ سَطَوَاتِ الْبَلَاءِ وَ نَجِّنِي مِنْ مُفَاجَاةِ النِّقَمِ وَ أَجِرْنِي مِنْ زَوَالِ النِّعَمِ وَ مِنْ زَلَلِ الْقَدَمِ وَ اجْعَلْنِي اللَّهُمَّ فِي حِيَاطَةِ عِزِّكَ وَ حِفَاظِ حِرْزِكَ مِنْ مُبَاغَتَةِ الدَّوَائِرِ وَ مُعَاجَلَةِ الْبَوَادِرِ اللَّهُمَّ رَبِّ وَ أَرْضُ الْبَلَاءِ فَاخْسِفْهَا وَ عَرْصَةُ الْمِحَنِ فَارْجُفْهَا وَ شَمْسُ النَّوَائِبِ فَاكْسِفْهَا وَ جِبَالُ السَّوْءِ فَانْسِفْهَا وَ كَرْبُ الدَّهْرِ فَاكْشِفْهَا وَ عَوَائِقُ الْأُمُورِ فَاصْرِفْهَا وَ أَوْرِدْنِي حِيَاضَ السَّلَامَةِ وَ احْمِلْنِي عَلَى مَطَايَا الْكَرَامَةِ وَ اصْحَبْنِي بِإِقَالَةِ الْعَثْرَةِ وَ اشْمَلْنِي بِسَتْرِ الْعَوْرَةِ وَ جُدْ عَلَيَّ يَا رَبِّ بِآلَائِكَ وَ كَشْفِ بَلَائِكَ وَ دَفْعِ ضَرَّائِكَ وَ ارْفَعْ كَلَاكِلَ عَذَابِكَ وَ اصْرِفْ عَنِّي أَلِيمَ عِقَابِكَ- وَ أَعِذْنِي مِنْ بَوَائِقِ الدُّهُورِ وَ أَنْقِذْنِي مِنْ سُوءِ عَوَاقِبِ الْأُمُورِ وَ احْرُسْنِي مِنْ جَمِيعِ الْمَحْذُورِ وَ اصْدَعْ صَفَاءَ الْبَلَاءِ عَنْ أَمْرِي وَ اشْلُلْ يَدَهُ عَنِّي مَدَى عُمُرِي إِنَّكَ الرَّبُّ الْمَجِيدُ الْمُبْدِئُ الْمُعِيدُ الْفَعَّالُ لِمَا تُرِيدُ