Typology of agnosticism

Below are Greek-derived conceptual names for the two forms of agnosticism you are distinguishing, chosen to be semantically precise, philosophically legible, and usable in serious academic discourse. I’ll first give a primary pair, then five alternative paired options, each with a brief gloss so the nuance is preserved.

---

Primary Terminological Pair (Recommended)

1. Epistemic, Fact-Bound Agnosticism

Aporiastic Agnosticism
(from aporía — impasse, puzzlement)

• Names the condition of being cognitively halted by insufficient or excessive information
• Connotes intellectual honesty and genuine inquiry
• Emphasizes epistemic blockage, not disengagement
• Classical philosophical pedigree (Plato, Aristotle)

Aporiastic agnosticism arises when cognition encounters a genuine impasse due to informational overload or undecidability.

---

2. Indifferent, Motivationally Withdrawn Agnosticism

Apathic Agnosticism
(from apatheia — absence of concern)

• Names motivational withdrawal rather than epistemic humility
• Signals emotional and existential disengagement
• Makes visible what is usually masked as “neutrality”
• Sociologically diagnostic

Apathic agnosticism resolves epistemic strain by nullifying concern rather than extending inquiry.

---

Five Alternative Greek Name Pairs

Each pair preserves the same contrast using a different philosophical emphasis.

---

Pair 1: Cognitive vs Existential

Aporiatic Agnosticism
vs
Ataraxic Agnosticism (ataraxia — tranquil indifference)

• Ataraxic suggests serenity achieved through disengagement
• Useful when analyzing late-modern quietism
• Resonates with Epicurean and Stoic traditions

---

Pair 2: Inquiry vs Withdrawal

Zetetic Agnosticism (zētēsis — searching, inquiry)
vs
Anesthetic Agnosticism (ana-aisthēsis — without sensation)

• Zetetic emphasizes ongoing search
• Anesthetic highlights numbing of existential sensitivity
• Particularly strong for cultural critique

---

Pair 3: Epistemic Humility vs Motivational Collapse

Skeptical Agnosticism (skepsis — examination)
vs
Anergic Agnosticism (a-ergon — without work)

• Anergic captures lack of epistemic effort
• Frames indifference as a failure of epistemic labor
• Useful in ethics and philosophy of responsibility

---

Pair 4: Constraint vs Convenience

Bounded Agnosticism (peras — limit, boundary)
vs
Euthymic Agnosticism (eu-thymia — pleasant composure)

• Euthymic names comfort-seeking equilibrium
• Useful for sociological or political philosophy contexts
• Highlights affective self-regulation

---

Pair 5: Tragic vs Therapeutic

Tragic Agnosticism (tragōidia — unresolved tension)
vs
Therapeutic Agnosticism (therapeia — treatment)

• Tragic agnosticism honors unresolved seriousness
• Therapeutic agnosticism treats belief as a stressor to be removed
• Strong in cultural philosophy and meta-ethics

---

Summary Table (Conceptual Map)

• Aporiastic / Zetetic / Skeptical → epistemically sincere, cognitively constrained, motivationally engaged
• Apathic / Ataraxic / Anesthetic → motivationally withdrawn, socially adaptive, existentially muted

---

Recommendation for Your Framework

For maximum clarity and reuse:

• Use Aporiastic Agnosticism for epistemic hesitation under cognitive overload
• Use Apathic Agnosticism for indifference as an adaptive masking strategy

These terms are:

• historically grounded
• analytically sharp
• non-polemical
• extensible across philosophy, sociology, and cognitive science