Hair-splitting dialectic, which involves excessively focusing on minor details or engaging in overly pedantic arguments, is generally not considered a virtue. This type of argumentation can be seen as unproductive or even counterproductive, as it can distract from the main point and lead to misunderstandings or confusion.
While there may be some situations where precision and attention to detail are important, such as in scientific or technical fields, in most contexts, hair-splitting dialectic can be seen as a hindrance to effective communication and problem-solving. It can also be seen as a sign of arrogance or an attempt to dominate a conversation through semantic or linguistic manipulation.
In contrast, virtues such as clarity, concision, and effective communication are generally seen as more important in most contexts. These virtues prioritize getting the main point across in a clear and concise manner, rather than getting bogged down in minor details or engaging in pedantic arguments.
That being said, there may be situations where hair-splitting dialectic can be useful, such as in legal or philosophical contexts where precise definitions and distinctions are important. However, even in these situations, it is important to balance precision with clarity and effective communication, and to avoid getting lost in irrelevant details.
A spiritual Ishmaelite 