In the traditional world, the reconciliation of text and reason was often approached through the study and interpretation of religious texts. For example, in Christianity, the Bible was seen as the authoritative source of truth, and scholars worked to understand and interpret its teachings through the use of reason and critical thinking.
One approach was to use a method called exegesis, which involved analyzing the text to understand its original context, the intended meaning of the author, and how it might be relevant to contemporary issues. This involved a careful study of language, history, culture, and philosophy.
Another approach was to use a method called hermeneutics, which focused on interpreting the text in light of broader philosophical and theological principles. This involved a more abstract and conceptual analysis of the text, drawing on concepts such as metaphysics, epistemology, and ethics.
Overall, the reconciliation of text and reason in the traditional world was a complex and multifaceted process, requiring a deep understanding of both the text and the broader intellectual and cultural context in which it was situated. It was a process that involved careful scholarship, critical thinking, and a commitment to truth and understanding.
Ishmael Abraham is with Rasheed Gillespie and 2 others.
I think Shafiis are better than Hanafis and Salafis because they seek compromise and reconciliation between text and intellect.
(Sorry but fiqh isn’t really that important to me.)
Kinda was the beginning of the end 🧐
